Episode 31 — Identify KPI and KRI Metrics That Reflect Security Performance and Exposure

This episode explains how to select KPIs and KRIs that accurately reflect security performance and risk exposure, which is heavily tested in ISSMP because leadership decisions depend on metrics that are defensible, actionable, and tied to governance outcomes rather than technical trivia. You will learn the difference between activity counts and outcome indicators, how KRIs signal increasing exposure, and how KPIs show whether the program is delivering capability improvements over time. We apply these concepts to realistic examples like patch latency trends, privileged access review completion, incident containment speed, control coverage for critical assets, and third-party assurance gaps, emphasizing how to choose measures that can be validated with evidence. Best practices include defining precise measurement definitions, setting baselines and targets, and ensuring metrics are comparable across time and teams. Troubleshooting covers noisy dashboards, vanity metrics, and misaligned targets that encourage gaming, with practical steps to refine measures so they support decision-making and auditability. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
Episode 31 — Identify KPI and KRI Metrics That Reflect Security Performance and Exposure
Broadcast by